I’m Not a Lumberjack and I also’m Not Actually OK; Angry Gambler Strikes Straight Back

I’m Not a Lumberjack and I also’m Not Actually OK; Angry Gambler Strikes Straight Back

Maybe Not everyone carrying an axe is a lumberjack

Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Probably not, since most lumberjacks do not generally carry their axes around with them on nights out. But two stories have popped up in the media showing that non-lumberjacks don’t necessarily stick to these rules.

Axing For Trouble

The first of these two tales of violence took place in a town bar in Fontaniva, Italy, in which a disgruntled gambler decided to exact https://casinopokies777.com/royalvegas-casino/ his revenge on some slots that are unsuspecting after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in two weeks.

The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and video streaming sites, where audiences can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.

After blowing off steam, the machine hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but perhaps not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits. Either this is an indication of victory, or a show of friendship towards these machines that are particular. Whenever coping with crazy, interpretations are anybody’s guess.

The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a bar that is nearby.

‘ He comes in here all of the time to try out the machines,’ said who owns the bar, who chose probably wisely- to keep nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a complete lot of cash. He’s a laborer and only works any now and then.’ Apparently, that is one worker whom keeps their equipment that is own handy.

‘He’s normally a really peaceful man. He just strolled in extremely calmly having an axe and smashed all the machines. There had been a few customers by them at that time and additionally they were terrified,’ he included.

Because of this of his strangely calm yet violent outburst, the man was sentenced for six months for criminal damage and possession of an unpleasant weapon. But jail overcrowding got him off with nothing more than a slap on the hand.

But Wait, There’s More…

The 2nd of these two tales is just a bit more terrifying, because the axe was wielded not at the slots, but at a person in the employees at a shop that is betting the Welsh capital of Cardiff.

Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ incident left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes shop that is betting Cardiff ‘in circumstances of shock.’

Before raiding the till and making down with a few money, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over his head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ employee with injury or worse if he don’t comply.

A authorities spokesperson investigating the criminal activity stated that two men, both wearing ski masks, entered the bookie’s shop at 9:30 pm on the nights the incident. One calmly stood guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the associate using the tree-chopping weapon.

The frightened shop assistant then handed over what police described as a ‘quantity of money,’ plus the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven with a third suspect.

Police are now appealing to the public that is local information that could help apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did maybe not wait calmly for arresting officers to show up regarding the scene.

Whose Casino Can It Be Anyway? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out

The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan

While each of the three licensing battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has already established its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight throughout the casino slated to be located in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston mayoral candidate is threatening a lawsuit over one particular proposal that would put a casino into the neighboring town of Everett.

Voting Rights

The legal choice is linked to the concept that neighboring communities is afflicted with casino projects, but won’t have to be able to vote on whether those casinos is opened in the beginning. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, an applicant for mayor of Boston, has been one of a handful of prospects who have recommended that all of Boston should be able to vote on a casino that would be positioned in East Boston, as an example.

When it comes down towards the proposed Wynn casino project in Everett, Conley says that allowing only Everett residents to vote onto it is unfair to the surrounding communities. If the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would file suit to stop the Everett casino based regarding the impact it would have on many Boston neighborhoods.

‘The Wynn proposal was voted…on in just one single community,’ Conley said within a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will bear its traffic, economic, and burdens that are social receive none of the proposed advantages.’

Based on the state laws that produced the opportunity for three casinos that are new Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get yourself a vote on whether or not allowing the projects to be built. However, casino developers are required to negotiate payment, with arbitration needed in the event that gambling enterprises and regional governments can’t visited an answer on their own.

Conley has proposed going for a path that is not really outlined in the 2011 casino law regarding the East Boston casino proposal, one that’s being produced by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He could have the whole city of Boston vote on whether to approve the proposal, while still granting East Boston veto power within the vote that is entire. In other terms, the casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the whole city so as to be authorized.

Yay or Nay?

A Boston Globe survey found that six of the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in favor of it, with just two coming out against it (with Conley and one other candidate not answering the question) while Conley has not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal. Meanwhile, four of ten applicants supported allowing the city that is entire vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to just East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents found that 44% had been in support of the casino, while 37% opposed it.

Regardless if voters return these proposals, just one will ultimately be chosen by hawaii since the site that is future of casino in the Boston area. Along with the Everett and East Boston casino plans, addititionally there is a proposal that is competing Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.

Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO

Chuka Umunna, taken to task for accepting donation

Chuka Umunna, cited as the rising star of the UK’s Labour Party who has publicly announced his discontent towards the bookmaking industry got their own hand caught in the recreations book cookie jar after accepting a donation of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from a retired premier sports betting company CEO.

Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation

As a betting shop critic who has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nonetheless accepted the big contribution from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing members of the Conservative Party to call the shadow business secretary out, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double standards.

Since Gala Coral Group is certainly one for the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for the many gambling outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the nation- it just didn’t really read well.

Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign directed at reducing the spread of bookies and betting stores in the neighborhood streets of his London that is south Streatham, and went as far as to promise ‘new powers to get a grip on the number of betting shops.’

‘I know there clearly was concern that is huge some streets in our area are steadily replenishing with gambling shops and payday loan businesses that take advantage of our community, rather than help us,’ wrote Umunna in a written report to local voters earlier this year.

‘ Can anyone really credibly believe anything Chuka ever Umunna says?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says something in public places and does another behind closed doors. Their hypocrisy seems to be limitless.’ And that is very unusual for the politician.

Spared on a Technicality

Nevertheless, fighting back in the corner associated with Labour Party MP, a spokesperson for Umunna reported that ‘this donation was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a individual capacity, and was accepted in respect because of the guidelines and correctly declared.’

Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the working workplace of Chuka Umunna in his capability as Shadow Secretary of State for Business, and for staffing,’ so it can officially pass as legitimate.

Even though Goulden is no further a relative head of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he invested as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group means he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.

Whether this is a donation that is completely innocent not, and whether or otherwise not the Conservative Party may just be searching to ruin the publicity of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after using this type of hard stance against the spread of the industry in their regional constituency.

‘ The thing that is only know he certainly believes is that the capital is filled with ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ stated Bob Neill.

Umunna, that is considered to be a future Labour Party leader, has recently experienced his share that is fair of as earlier this present year his office had been accused of editing their Wikipedia page showing comparisons between himself and Barack Obama.